|
Dear Friends,
News reports say that Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos will announce her tax credit plan to fund private school tuition with federal money at a meeting in Indianapolis this Monday, May 22nd. This is the first nationwide step in the Trump Administration plan to take to cut federal funding for public schools and start using federal funds to support private school tuition scholarships. A bill to fund tax credits to help private schools has already been filed in Congress. It is not surprising that Betsy DeVos wants to announce her plan in Indiana. She has been the most influential funder behind Indiana’s historic and damaging switch to giving public tax money to private and religious schools and the relentless deconstruction of public schools in Indiana. According to reporters Stephanie Wang and Chelsea Schneider (Indianapolis Star, Jan. 15, 2017, p. 21A) DeVos has provided $2.5 million since 2004 to provide campaign funds for Indiana politicians who support vouchers. That paved the way to historic votes in 2009, 2011, 2013 and now 2017 which step by step have advanced the privatization of the public school system in Indiana. The Deconstruction of Public Education As the dust settles after adjournment of the 2017 Indiana General Assembly, it is clear that the deconstruction of public schools in Indiana has continued. The third pillar of Indiana public education fell in this session. We will no longer have a Superintendent of Public Education but rather a secretary of education which will no longer be elected by the public after the 2020 election (House Bill 1005). The deconstruction of public education is led by the followers of the policies of the late Milton Friedman and funded by Betsy DeVos. They have developed a strong power base in the Indiana General Assembly which has prevailed on this issue for nine years. Previous Pillars If the third pillar fell in 2017, what were the previous two pillars to fall? 1) The first pillar fell in 2009, when for the first time public money was budgeted for private school tuition through tax credits for donors to Scholarship Granting Organizations. The 2009 budget gave $5 million over two years for tax credits that would refund 50% of each donor’s gift toward private school scholarships. In the new 2017 budget funding for such tax credits, once $5 million, now stands at $26.5 million over the next two years. This is the program that Betsy DeVos wants to begin nationwide to use federal money to pay for private school tuition. The Indiana program passed in 2009 is the most generous tax credit available in Indiana. Donors giving to private school scholarship organizations get 50% back when they file state income tax forms, and there is no limit per taxpayer! A million dollar donation would produce a $500,000 tax credit, ideal for high income earners who want to support private schools. The only limit is the total annual appropriation, so taxpayers have to make their claim before others take the credits. 2) The second pillar fell in 2011 when the historic voucher law passed, giving public money directly to private school parents and schools for private school tuition. Funding for private school vouchers cost taxpayers $146 million in the current 2016-17 school year, up from $15 million in the first year of the program, 2011-12. For those who would like to see the details of annual voucher costs, please see the attached six-year overview. Sadly, the policies of the current leadership in the General Assembly have sent the message that more pillars will be attacked each new session in pursuit of Milton Friedman’s goal to end public education and provide universal vouchers. Will the General Assembly’s Priority on Helping Private Schools Be Reversed? The plan to diminish support and funding for public education is proceeding apace. Besides ending the independent voice of the elected State Superintendent, this legislative session: 1) created an eighth pathway for eligibility for a private school voucher. Seven pathways established in 2011 and 2013 have produced 34,299 students eligible for a voucher, 54.6% of whom have never enrolled previously in a public school. The eighth pathway is to attend a private preschool with a state pre-K grant and then stay on in the same private school for kindergarten and beyond at taxpayer’s expense (House Bill 1004). 2) made it possible to keep getting new voucher students when private schools get low school letter grades. HB 1384 was amended to allow a loophole for voucher schools making a D or F to continue to enroll new voucher students by filing an appeal to the State Board of Education. Currently, voucher schools making a D or F for two years can keep enrolling their current voucher students but can’t enroll new voucher students until their school grades improve. 3) made it possible for the first time for a new private school to get vouchers in the first year of operation (HB 1384). Previously, operation for at least one year was required while the school was reviewed for accreditation. In Summary All in all, it was a good legislative session for the privatizers. Public education remains on the ropes and now it is being attacked nationally through the work of Betsy DeVos. Public education will remain in jeopardy until candidates and voters in election campaigns make it clear that the deconstruction our system of public education in Indiana and in the nation is unacceptable and is damaging to our democracy. I urge you to write members of Congress that you oppose the DeVos plan to take federal money away from public schools and give it instead to private schools via federal tax credit scholarships. I urge you to write members of the Indiana General Assembly that you are disappointed that they sent the message again in this session that public education is a low priority and that expanding public dollars for private schools continues to get priority attention from the leaders of the General Assembly. Thank you for your active support of public education in Indiana and nationwide! Best wishes, Vic Smith [email protected] “Vic’s Statehouse Notes” and ICPE received one of three Excellence in Media Awards presented by Delta Kappa Gamma Society International, an organization of over 85,000 women educators in seventeen countries. The award was presented on July 30, 2014 during the Delta Kappa Gamma International Convention held in Indianapolis. Thank you Delta Kappa Gamma! ICPE has worked since 2011 to promote public education in the Statehouse and oppose the privatization of schools. We need your membership to help support ICPE lobbying efforts. As of July 1st, the start of our new membership year, it is time for all ICPE members to renew their membership. Our lobbyist Joel Hand represented ICPE extremely well during the 2017 budget session. We need your memberships and your support to continue his work. We welcome additional members and additional donations. We need your help and the help of your colleagues who support public education! Please pass the word! Go to www.icpe2011.com for membership and renewal information and for full information on ICPE efforts on behalf of public education. Thanks! Some readers have asked about my background in Indiana public schools. Thanks for asking! Here is a brief bio: I am a lifelong Hoosier and began teaching in 1969. I served as a social studies teacher, curriculum developer, state research and evaluation consultant, state social studies consultant, district social studies supervisor, assistant principal, principal, educational association staff member, and adjunct university professor. I worked for Garrett-Keyser-Butler Schools, the Indiana University Social Studies Development Center, the Indiana Department of Education, the Indianapolis Public Schools, IUPUI, and the Indiana Urban Schools Association, from which I retired as Associate Director in 2009. I hold three degrees: B.A. in Ed., Ball State University, 1969; M.S. in Ed., Indiana University, 1972; and Ed.D., Indiana University, 1977, along with a Teacher’s Life License and a Superintendent’s License, 1998. In 2013 I was honored to receive a Distinguished Alumni Award from the IU School of Education, and in 2014 I was honored to be named to the Teacher Education Hall of Fame by the Association for Teacher Education – Indiana. Below are state-level bills that ICPE-Monroe County has been following closely. These bills primarily have to do with vouchers, charters and/or funding. These are only a handful of education bills reviewed by the Statehouse this year. To read about the others, see ISTA’s legislative review here.
The summary below is pulled from this review by ISTA. We are incredibly grateful for all the work ISTA does lobbying, negotiating and reporting on education matters at the Statehouse. Bills That Became Law HB 1001 State Biennial Budget - The school funding formula provides an average increase in regular education funding at 1.6 percent in 2018 and 1.5 percent in 2019. They are well below recent increases given in FY 2014 (2.0%), in FY 2016 (2.3%) and in the current year FY 2017 (2.3%).You can read more in Vic’s Notes. In the budget for 2018-2019, the total investment in new charter schools is $35 million. Voucher schools receive a significant increase in funding in the budget, going from a total commitment of $146 million in 2017 to $156 million in 2018, a 7.2 percent increase. Vouchers will receive another $167 million in 2019, a 6.9 percent increase. The amount of the actual voucher is tied to public school K-12 funding. This percentage increase is in growth of the voucher program, not necessarily the growth in the voucher amount per student. The budget increased the private school voucher tax credit from the current $9.5 million per year to $12.5 million in 2018 and again to $14 million in 2019. The tax credit is mostly being leveraged by Indiana’s wealthiest taxpayers to support private school tuition. HB 1004 PreK Funding - The enacted version settled on $22 million each year, up from the current $10 million. The bill allows the voucher pathway only if the parents choose the same school to continue their child's education. However, this is now the 7th pathway one can take to become voucher eligible. The bill includes the virtual pre-K program with up to $1 million each year for funding. You can read more here. HB 1005 Appointed Superintendent of Public Instruction - Beginning in 2025, the state superintendent of public instruction will be replaced with a secretary of education appointed by the governor. ICPE opposed the bill, as it takes away voters' rights to elect a state education leader. HB 1007 - Education Course Access Program - This bill creates a course-based voucher program that enables students to enroll and pay for online courses funded by the student's public school. In effect, the operation of this bill would force school districts to contract out educational services at a parent's or student's request. IDOE will develop the catalog of courses to be made available. It is important to question who will be teaching these online courses. And also note that school districts already arrange for alternative courses for students when authentic needs arise relative to course offerings. Yet, supporters convinced lawmakers that this authorization would somehow help smaller school districts. This is a model bill created by the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC). There is little doubt that it is part of a national agenda promoting the privatization of public education, and its implementation should be closely monitored. HB 1382 Charters - The bill makes numerous changes to charter school accountability. A good thing: It requires financial disclosure and conflicts of interest statements to be filed for local charter board members. A bad thing: The bill enables 90 percent of charter school teachers to be licensed under "any license or permit," which effectively means that individuals who hold a substitute teacher license will be considered within the 90 percent of licensed or permitted teachers employed in charter schools. The genesis of this provision likely had its roots in a recent State Board of Education decision denying a waiver to a charter school that was operating in violation of the existing licensing rules. Public school students, be they in charters or traditional schools, deserve properly trained, licensed teachers. One more bad thing: The bill also grants charter authorizer status as state education authorities for federal purposes, potentially posing Family and Education Rights Privacy Act risks related to access to student data. HB 1384 High School Graduation/Removal of Accountability for Voucher Schools - This bill originally focused on the calculation of graduation rates, but early on an amendment was added enabling D and F private voucher schools to skirt existing accountability standards. Under current law, if a private voucher school has two consecutive years as a D or F school, it loses its right to receive new vouchers. Under this bill, the State Board of Education would be allowed to grant an annual waiver or a delay of that single accountability sanction, if "a majority of students demonstrated academic improvement" from the prior year. The new standard for private voucher schools makes it glaringly clear that academic improvement is certainly not the same thing as performance on standardized tests—the latter being the standard which drives accountability for community-based public schools. On the positive side, the bill removes the second window previously granted to voucher schools for enrolling students during the second semester. The bill also allows the State Board of Education to accredit new private schools in their first year of operation so that these schools can enter the state's voucher program right away. The result is that the pool of voucher students could expand further without first requiring one year of operation before the school becomes eligible to accept vouchers, ultimately giving these schools access to tax dollars before any track record of performance is evidenced. SB 567 Distressed School Districts/Fiscally Impaired School Districts - This began as a bill to assist the Gary Community School Corporation in dealing with some extreme fiscal conditions. The bill evolved over the course of the legislative session into a bill that could have taken over both the Gary Community Schools and the Muncie Community School Corporation. However, a team of community members, including the Muncie Teachers Association together with ISTA, prevented a state takeover with the pledge that Muncie can plan itself out of its fiscal difficulties. Gary schools continue to be declared "a distressed unit" and will have an emergency manager, a chief fiscal officer and a chief academic officer running its operation. Muncie Schools is declared a fiscally impaired school district through the end of this calendar year. The district will have an emergency manager, who may be the current superintendent, but there is no requirement for chief fiscal or academic officers. The law affords the district a chance to get out from the fiscally impaired and a potential distressed unit status by the end of the year. Bills That Died Below are some key bills that did not become law. These are just a few. To read about the others, see ISTA’s review. SB 534 Special Education Accounts - This bill would have established the Indiana Special Education Scholarship Account program, a further expansion of school choice in Indiana, beyond the state's controversial private school voucher program. The legislation is part of the ALEC model bill portfolio. Under the bill, students who have been identified as having a disability, which requires special education services would have qualified for an education savings account (ESA). Unlike Indiana's current school voucher program, the student's family would receive 100 percent of the funding that their local public district would have received from the state, versus up to 90 percent for a school voucher. Families could have used the ESA funds to pay outside service providers. ISTA opposed the bill. Sen. Kruse heard the bill in committee but announced that he would not move it further, rendering it dead in the Senate and for this 2017 session. HB 1386 Competency-based Education - The bill would have established a competency-based education pilot program, a system under which a student advances to higher levels of learning once he/she demonstrates competency in concepts and skills regardless of time, place or pace. The bill would have opened the door to more virtual-type programming and would have posed issues with students rushing through curricula. Research shows that fast-tracking learning reduces knowledge retention. This bill passed out of the House but failed to pass in the Senate. HB 1383 Elementary School Teachers -The introduced version of HB 1383 would have required every elementary school teacher initially licensed after 2021 to secure specialization in a specific content area and would have eliminated the elementary generalist license. Testimony against the bill clarified that current course requirements already include content areas. Current licensure requirements call for all candidates to complete a content minor or concentration area. And along the way, all candidates must pass the Indiana CORE assessment, which covers reading/language arts, math, science, health and physical education and social studies and fine arts. In the face of opposition, Rep. Behning (R- Indianapolis) offered an amendment to the bill that took a step back by directing the State Board of Education to establish, "one or more elementary school teacher content area licenses that must, at a minimum, include a content area license that includes math and science." But, that effort failed, too, rendering the current licensure system maintained. HB 1591 - Education Options Account Program - This bill was the House version of the Education Savings Accounts bill in the Senate (See SB 534). This bill was an ALEC model for privatizing schools by allowing students to take advantage of individual accounts that would divert public tax dollars from school districts to private providers. The House version was more expansive than even SB 534 by including all eligible students and not just special education. Dear Friends,
The General Assembly has given Indiana’s public schools a new unfunded mandate. Action in the General Assembly has made it imperative that public schools establish quality pre-kindergarten programs. Without them, enrollment in public schools will wither. Why, you say? The 2017 Session of the General Assembly, reversing a key policy set in law in the 2014 General Assembly, has made pre-K students who get a state grant to attend a private pre-school eligible to enroll in that school’s K-12 program with a taxpayer-funded voucher . The pre-kindergarten law passed in 2014 carried language ensuring no link between pre-kindergarten grants and K-12 vouchers: “The receipt of a grant under the pilot program does not qualify, nor have an effect on the qualification or eligibility, of a child for a Choice Scholarship.” In the recently concluded 2017 session, the House passed a pre-K bill (HB 1004) to reverse this language and make pre-K grants a pipeline to K-12 vouchers. The Senate later deleted the House language on this point and again removed pre-K grants as a pathway to expanding K-12 vouchers. In the Conference Committee to reconcile the different House and Senate versions, the House won. Pre-K grants are now the latest pathway to K-12 vouchers, the eighth pathway. This result has tremendous implications for Indiana’s public schools. If public schools want to enroll kindergarten students, they must now make immediate plans to establish pre-K programs to compete with private pre-K programs which now plan to lift their market share of K-12 students one pre-K student at a time. As the pre-K program expands, all state-funded pre-K students could end up in private K-12 schools using a voucher unless quality public school options are available for pre-K as well. If public schools decide to leave pre-K programs to private schools, HB 1004 will lead to the enrollment of most of the pre-K students on state grants into private school kindergartens, and into private school first grades the year after that. Through House Bill 1004, private school advocates can now set plans to recruit every pre-K student to private pre-schools, taking away future public school students and filling up current private K-12 schools as well as national franchise private schools coming in the future. For survival in the next decade, it is now clear that public schools must begin or expand quality pre-kindergarten programs. The Conference Committee on House Bill 1004 The Conference Committee had to reconcile several differences between the House and Senate pre-K bills, but the issue with the most K-12 impact was the provision to give vouchers to those with pre-K grants in private K-12 schools that accept vouchers. The language of the Conference Committee was trimmed from the original bill. Eligibility was secured for each pre-K student that “continues to attend the eligible school at which the individual attended a prekindergarten program.” The language left is plenty to force an unfunded mandate on public schools that want to compete for kindergarten students. House conferees won one more expansion of voucher eligibility. Now as pre-K students with state grants move to kindergarten, they are eligible for a voucher. Projecting growth in pre-K over many years, voucher advocates no doubt were determined to secure this pathway to K-12 vouchers because it obviously could result in nearly universal vouchers as the goal of universal pre-K is reached. Senator Melton, who worked hard to break the link between pre-K grants and K-12 vouchers, refused to sign the conference committee report and was replaced at the last minute by Senator Raatz. The Fiscal Cost of Expanded K-12 Vouchers in HB 1004 In addition to the new funding for pre-K expansion, extra fiscal costs will be required to pay for the K-12 voucher commitments this new law makes to pre-K students who stay in voucher schools for kindergarten. In estimating those extra costs, the non-partisan Legislative Services Agency found that “in FY 2017, there were 171 children attending preschool at Choice Scholarship schools” in the current programs. Then as a foreshadow of additional costs in future years, the LSA stated “As more students participate in the Pilot Programs, more Choice Scholarships would be awarded if participants choose to apply for Choice Scholarships and capacity is available in participating Choice Scholarship schools.” You get the picture. There is enormous potential for growth and extra voucher costs. As for now, basing potential costs on the 171 students now in the program, LSA stated “if all children enroll in Choice programs, and they would not have attended public school otherwise, there would be an increase in expenditures of $738,378 in FY2018 and $748,638 in FY2019.” Paying for students to go to private school when they always planned to go to private school carries a significant fiscal cost. Final Votes In the final votes on the Conference Committee Report, support for pre-K expansion carried the day. The House approved the bill 82-16 and the Senate approved the bill 31-19. The fight to stop K-12 voucher expansion through pre-K programs was lost in the closed door discussions of the Conference Committee. Now public school leaders need to respond to this unfunded mandate to expand quality pre-K programs. Thanks to all who sent messages to legislators to break the link between pre-K and K-12 voucher expansion. Thank you for your active support of public education in Indiana! Best wishes, Vic Smith [email protected] “Vic’s Statehouse Notes” and ICPE received one of three Excellence in Media Awards presented by Delta Kappa Gamma Society International, an organization of over 85,000 women educators in seventeen countries. The award was presented on July 30, 2014 during the Delta Kappa Gamma International Convention held in Indianapolis. Thank you Delta Kappa Gamma! ICPE has worked since 2011 to promote public education in the Statehouse and oppose the privatization of schools. We need your membership to help support ICPE lobbying efforts. As of July 1st, the start of our new membership year, it is time for all ICPE members to renew their membership. Our lobbyist Joel Hand represented ICPE extremely well during the 2017 budget session. We need your memberships and your support to continue his work. We welcome additional members and additional donations. We need your help and the help of your colleagues who support public education! Please pass the word! |
Categories
All
Archives
March 2024
Friends
|
RSS Feed
Proudly powered by Weebly