Indiana Coalition for Public Education — Monroe County
  • About Us
    • Mission & Vision
    • Our Beliefs
    • By-Laws
    • Who Is Our Lobbyist
    • Why We Need to Defend Public Education
    • Board Members
    • Friends
    • How You Can Help
  • How to Join
  • Meetings & Events
    • Meetings & Calendar
    • Events
  • Blog
  • Press
    • Contact the Press
    • In the News
    • Press Releases
    • Videos
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletters

Dr. McCormick on the Every Student Succeeds Act and Indiana's graduation pathways proposal

11/29/2017

 
Our state superintendent, Dr. Jennifer McCormick, visited Bloomington November 9. Here are some takeaways from the conversation that she had with educators and parents.
 
1) There is a slow-motion train wreck impending in Indiana in the form of a drop in graduation rates. Under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA), the U.S. Department of Education will not count Indiana’s general diploma toward the state’s graduation rates. ESSA requires that the most commonly given diploma be the one that is counted. Indiana’s practice of awarding differentiated diplomas (general, core 40, honors) is a liability for the state. McCormick says that the general diploma is actually more stringent than some other states’ diplomas that have been approved, but the U.S. DOE is proving inflexible. The Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) has applied for a waiver but does not expect to receive it.
 
McCormick asked us, “Do you want those 9000 kids [currently receiving the general diploma] unemployed and unemployable across the nation?” She also said that under ESSA, because the general diploma would not count, 275 Indiana high schools would receive Ds and Fs. “Do we have room for improvement? Yes. But this is not Indiana. You need to assess us fairly.”
 
One possible solution, according to McCormick, would require legislative action. Indiana legislators could make all the diplomas the general diploma, with the other, more demanding diplomas just a version of the general diploma. So far, the legislature has not seen this as urgent.
 
2) Another result of ESSA is that there will be two grades, one from the federal government and one from the state. Imagine: two possibly different letter grades, with two possibly conflicting sets of consequences. McCormick believes the logical response to this is to accept the federal grade as the state grade.
 
McCormick stated she wants to provide comprehensive and targeted support for failing schools, but reminded the audience that Indiana has moved to a four-year, from a six-year, cycle. Any school that receives 4 F’s in a row under the state grading rubric is at risk of state takeover. School districts in financial distress are also at risk of takeover.
 
3) There is a major problem to solve in the form of diplomas that the federal government won’t count under ESSA, but the State Board of Education (SBOE) has been focused on the graduation pathways proposal. The panel which developed the proposal was mainly composed of professionals in higher education and business. There was a high school counselor, but no high school principal. Here are some consequences of the proposal, if it is approved.

  • Students who are in 7th grade today, in addition to completing required coursework, will have to take and pass one of the following to graduate: a college entrance exam (the ACT or SAT), military test, apprenticeship, industry-approved certification...or get a C or higher in a set of three career-technical education courses or AP/IB/Cambridge International/CLEP courses.  The last alternative is to complete a “locally designed pathway.”
  • Students will also need to complete a project-based, service-based, or work-based learning experience. Extracurriculars fall into the service category. Having a job outside the school day would count toward the work category.
  • A conservative estimate of the additional annual cost of testing, as a result of the grad pathways proposal, is $20 million.
  • Apprenticeships may be an option to fulfill one of three required pathways, but there will be large variations in access to apprenticeship opportunities depending on the location of districts. This cuts against the longtime goal of the DOE to ensure that kids have equitable opportunities in all public schools to gain a diploma.
  • Extracurriculars will be able to count toward graduation, but this brings up a slew of complications. Students have a basic right to participate in the curriculum. They don’t have a right to participate in extracurriculars; there may be conditions on participation, such as keeping grades at a certain point or behavioral requirements. However, if extracurriculars can count toward a diploma, are they truly extracurricular, or are they co-curricular? Again, some districts have many more extracurriculars than others, so the issue of equal access is present here too.
 
Other questions the proposal brings up:
  • Who will pay for additional tests if students do not pass the first one?
  • What is in this proposal for our average- to low-performing students? McCormick expressed concern: “We don’t have a design to affect the rigor and impact of our courses, we are just focused on measurement and [penalties].”
  • How will anyone know what an Indiana diploma means when different superintendents/districts create different local pathways meant to make it possible for kids to graduate?
  • We already have a sizable percentage of students who struggle to complete diploma requirements (12% of graduates receive the general diploma). Why would we create additional requirements outside of the already required coursework? Why can we not focus on curriculum and instruction and providing resources in schools?
 
The SBOE is accepting comments on the graduation pathways proposal through December 2. Since this is such a complicated proposal, presenting concise comments poses a challenge. Here are possible avenues:
 
*Voice concern about the potential negative impact the plan would have on graduation rates. 
*Encourage SBOE to consider diploma types as the Graduation Pathway. 
*Reinforce the idea that much of the concern expressed by workforce and higher ed can be addressed through curriculum and instruction. 
*Ignoring/dismissing the constraints associated with implementation of such a plan is irresponsible. 
*Consideration needs to be given to students who are not in the high 25-30 percent of performers. 

You can e-mail your comments to the State Board of Education at the following address: [email protected]. It is also possible to comment in person on this issue at the SBOE work session on Tuesday, December 5, 1 p.m., in the Indiana Government Center South Auditorium at 302 West Washington Street in Indianapolis. Public comment will be limited to one hour total, three minutes per person. It appears that the SBOE intends to vote on the proposal in a meeting the following day, December 6.


Comments are closed.

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

    Categories

    All
    Accountability
    A To F Grades
    Call To Action 2020
    Call To Action 2022
    Cathy's Speeches
    Charter School Program (CSP)
    Charter Schools
    Covid 19
    CRT
    Death By A Thousand Cuts $
    Democracy
    Diploma
    Education Scholarship Accounts (ESAs)
    Equity
    Events
    Follow The Money
    Free Lunch
    ILEARN
    IPS
    Kindergarten
    Petitions
    Race/history
    Redistricting
    Referendum Sharing
    Religion
    Reopening
    School Board
    School Choice
    School Marketing
    Special Education
    Statehouse
    Teachers
    Tech Trep
    Testing
    Textbooks
    Vic's Statehouse Notes
    Vouchers
    Year In Review

    Archives

    September 2024
    March 2024
    January 2024
    April 2022
    January 2022
    November 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    January 2021
    October 2020
    September 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    September 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    September 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    October 2015
    August 2015
    May 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    July 2014
    May 2014
    February 2014

    Friends

    Vic's Statehouse Notes
    Network for Public Education
    Northeast Indiana Friends of Public Education

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly
Photo from wuestenigel
  • About Us
    • Mission & Vision
    • Our Beliefs
    • By-Laws
    • Who Is Our Lobbyist
    • Why We Need to Defend Public Education
    • Board Members
    • Friends
    • How You Can Help
  • How to Join
  • Meetings & Events
    • Meetings & Calendar
    • Events
  • Blog
  • Press
    • Contact the Press
    • In the News
    • Press Releases
    • Videos
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletters