The Senate Appropriations K-12 Funding Subcommittee will meet Thursday starting some time between 10 a.m. and afternoon. They will consider HB-1001, the State Budget bill. Here's what it could do to public schools:

• It would make the cap on the scholarship granting organization (SGO) scholarship tax credit even higher than it is now - making it easier to drain more students from public schools and taking away more of the tax revenue that pays for school funding, while giving more tax relief to the wealthy.

• It would put a permanent increase in the SGO cap of 120% of the previous year. Are public schools getting a permanent increase of 20% in funding each year? NO, THEY ARE NOT. Why should that cap (used primarily by the wealthy) be allowed to grow that much each year?

• It would reduce the Complexity Index by 14%. That's the index that gives more money to districts with a high proportion of low-income children. These children are more complex to educate and need more support services. Do we think it's a good idea to reduce that? (See more below.)

• It increases the total Tuition Support by 2.2% in FY2019 and 2.2% in FY2020. While it's nice to get more money, IT'S NOT ENOUGH!

• It creates a new category of Choice Scholarships (code word for vouchers). I know we said this above, but it drains more students from public schools and diverts more of YOUR TAX money to private and religious schools.

Here's what ICPE board member and former school superintendent Dr. Tony Lux has to say about reducing the complexity index:

Reducing the Complexity Index by 14% is outrageous! The Complexity Index was reduced back in 2014 and redistributed primarily to wealthy suburban school systems. Now they want to reduce it again at a time when 54% of school systems have declining enrollments (and therefore reduced funding) and where the Complexity Index is the one element of the funding formula that provides some stability. The Complexity Index is a means to actually assist declining enrollment urban and rural school systems so they could provide teacher salary increases!

Even though legislators may argue that all school systems will see reduction in Complexity Index funding, the declining enrollment school systems - primarily urban and rural - will get a double hit as they lose enrollment funds and then lose even more funds for the neediest students they still serve!!!  In the meantime, growing suburban schools systems actually get a bonus: on top of their additional student count, they get the money originally intended for the neediest kids thrown into foundation funding!! 

It is robbing the poor to help the wealthy!

Rich vs. Poor - Don't Fall for the Trick

This is what anti-public school forces like to do. They want to divide us. Policies that put suburban schools against urban and rural schools are destructive all around. The budget should be fair to ALL public schools. Stand together!   

Senate Appropriations K-12 Funding Subcommittee

Email or call these committee members - and your own Senator before Thursday.
 
Senator Eric Bassler
Sen. Liz Brown
Sen. Ed Charbonneau
Sen. Jeff Raatz
Sen. Karen Tallian
Sen. Greg Taylor

If you like, copy and paste these addresses into the "to" field of your email.
 
Senator.Bassler@iga.in.gov; Senator.Brown@iga.in.gov;
Senator.Charbonneau@iga.in.gov; Senator.Raatz@iga.in.gov;
s4@iga.in.gov; s33@iga.in.gov

It's winter, nearing spring. In Indiana, that means wild swings in temperature, sun and wind one day and hail the next. We get out the bikes, but don't put the snow shovel away. For people who care about K-12 education, it may be winter, but it's another kind of season, too, that brings its own kind of dread: the legislative session. In the policy realm, it is a season of surprises. There are always lots of plans in the works for Indiana schools. This year, by one count, 135 education bills were filed.

And what an array of bills they have been! Bills of questionable constitutionality, like a requirement to post patriotic elements in all classrooms, to give students credit for religion courses, to make parents bear the legal costs of the school district if the parents challenge an IEP and the judge turns them down—and that last bill, by the way, proposed making schools’ online communications not subject to public records law. A bill making it harder to pass a school levy. A bill that requires public schools to sell unused buildings to private schools if they express interest, and that would have required the funds raised by referenda to be shared with nearby charter schools. A bill with the weird, ominous provision that one public school district can claim a school in another district if the township trustee in that other district agrees. A bill that provides grant funding for schools to train teachers to use guns, and that makes it illegal to share which teachers/staff have received that training.
 
These bills would have real effects, and we’ve chased after them. We’ve gotten indignant, we’ve called legislators, and in some cases the bills have been modified by amendments to become less damaging.
 
But we have to keep our eye on the ball. This is a budget year, and the budget for education sets the baseline parameters for our schools. Budget proposals tend to be hard to wrap our minds around. The numbers are so large and they get distributed in opaque and complicated ways. There’s no narrative, no emotional arc.
 
Here are some facts related to the budget for K-12 education in Indiana:

• Though more than a decade has passed since the crash of 2008, school funding has not recovered to pre-recession levels when adjusted for inflation.
• 35% of new teachers quit within the first five years, and 88% cite low pay as the reason.
• Since the $300 million for education was slashed from the state budget in 2009, schools have had to pinch and cut. Indiana has become a referendum state. A referendum is necessary if a district wants to maintain teachers and programs. Schools in affluent communities are much more likely to pursue and pass referenda. Now we have a widening gap between the haves and have-nots: those with levies and those without.
• Property tax caps written into the state constitution in 2010 made it impossible for districts in hard-hit areas with declining property values to collect adequate funds for transportation and capital projects.

• State policies now encourage families and taxpayer funds to leave community-governed public schools and go to charter schools (which are privately managed) and to private schools. Since 2011, more than $680 million in our tax dollars has gone to private schools through vouchers. Over $1 billion has gone to charter schools, which serve self-selecting families, have self-appointed boards, are exempt from broad swathes of education law, and do not have the same transparency requirements or teacher certification requirements as public schools. Between a quarter and a fifth of charter schools that have opened have also closed, leaving families in the lurch.

 
Our kids and our communities deserve better. Underfunded schools have crumbling infrastructure, large class sizes, fewer bus routes, aging buses, high teacher turnover, and less science, social studies, art, music, and library, not to mention fewer curriculars and stressed teachers working second jobs at Starbucks. Underfunded schools hire fewer social workers, counselors, nurses, speech therapists, and school psychologists—professionals whose work supports the physical and emotional health of our children.
 
So here’s the ask. Call Senator Ryan Mishler, chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee, at 317-232-9814 and tell him that we need a 3% budget increase each year, for both 2020 and 2021—6% over two years—for our community public schools. Governor Holcomb and the House both proposed about a 2% increase, but that is not enough. The House budget includes $18 million in additional money for the voucher program and an additional $77 million for charter schools. The proposed increase in foundation funding was only 1.5% and 1.7% per year, per student, for public school students, but 5.2% and 1.7% for students in the voucher program. This is unacceptable. It’s the Senate’s turn to issue a budget proposal, and we need to see a 3% per year increase in foundation funding per student for the kids in our public schools—actual public schools which have a mandate to serve all children in our communities, schools in which our communities have a voice, schools which cannot counsel out or reject kids based on their special needs or religion or behavior.
 
After you’ve called Senator Mishler, call your own state senator at 317-232-9400 to say the same thing. And then ask your family and friends to do the same.
 
–Jenny Robinson
 
 
 

Dear Friends,

Will the Indiana General Assembly find enough money to allow K-12 public schools to pay teachers more and to provide stable programs?

That is the overriding question as the new two-year budget takes shape.  The outcome is not clear.

The K-12 budget increases listed below for the past twelve years have not provided enough to pay teachers properly.  Thus, there is urgency in finding more K-12 money in this budget cycle.

The proposed budget from the House Ways and Means Committee will be unveiled tomorrow, Feb. 19th.

The budget proposed by the Senate is expected around the beginning of April.

The compromise budget putting the Senate and House versions together is expected near the end of April.

I hope you will be involved at each step in asking legislators for a 3% increase in K-12 funding.

How Big Will the K-12 Increase Be?

On Wednesday February 6th, the public hearing was held on requests for the new budget in the House Ways and Means Committee. Joel Hand, representing the Indiana Coalition for Public Education, testified about the importance of increasing K-12 tuition support by 3% in the budget.  State Superintendent McCormick had asked for a 3% increase back in October.

Governor Holcomb, in his budget plan released on January 10th, called for a 2% increase in K-12 tuition support, totaling $143 million in the first year and an additional $146 million in the second year.  In addition, he recommended that money from the surplus be used to pay 2% of school district pension payments, out of 7.5% owed by school districts, which he said would free up $70 million in each year of the budget for districts to use to give raises to teachers.

This was a far better proposal than Speaker Bosma was talking about in November when he said at most there would be only a 0.7% increase in K-12 for next year. 

Study the table below to see the history of funding increases in the past six budgets and the prospects for next year’s funding:

 _______________________________________________________________________________________

Indiana School Funding Increase for the Past Six Budgets 

Source:  The summary cover page from the General Assembly’s School Formulas for each budget
Prepared by Dr. Vic Smith, 12/2/18

When the school funding formulas are passed every two years by the General Assembly, legislators see the bottom line percentage increases on a summary page. Figures that have appeared on this summary are listed below for the last six budgets that I have personally observed as they were approved by the legislature.

Tuition support and dollar increases have been rounded to the nearest 10 million dollars.
 
Budget Year             Total Tuition Support      Percent Increase       Dollar Increase
                                                                        from Previous Year    from Previous Year
2007 BUDGET:
FY 2008                      $6.27 Billion                  +4.1%                      +$250 Million
FY 2009                      $6.48 Billion                  +3.6%                      +$210 Million

2009 BUDGET:         
FY 2010                      $6.55 Billion                  +1.1%                       +$70 Million
FY 2011                      $6.57 Billion                  +0.3%                       +$20 Million

2011 BUDGET:
FY 2012                      $6.28 Billion                   -4.5%                      -$290 Million
FY 2013                      $6.34 Billion                  +1.0%                         +60 Million

2013 BUDGET:
FY 2014                      $6.62 Billion                   +2.0%                       +$280 Million
FY 2015                      $6.69 Billion                   +1.0%                         +$70 Million

2015 BUDGET:
FY 2016                      $6.82 Billion                    +2.3%                      +$130 Million
FY 2017                      $6.98 Billion                    +2.3%                      +$160 Million

2017 BUDGET:
FY 2018                      $7.04 Billion                     +1.6%                        +$60 Million
FY 2019                      $7.16 Billion                    +1.7%                       +$120 Million
 
Total funding and percentage increases were taken directly from the School Funding Formula summary page.  Sometimes in the first year of two budget years, the previous budget amount was not fully spent and the adjusted lowered base was used by the General Assembly to calculate the percentage increase.

_____________________________________________________________________________

Three Projections for K-12 Tuition Support as the Next Line in the Table

1.  Governor Holcomb’s Projection

2019 BUDGET per Governor Holcomb: The Governor’s budget was released on 1/10/19:

FY 2020                      $7.30 Billion                     +2.0%                        +$143 Million
FY 2021                      $7.45 Billion                     +2.0%                        +$146 Million
 
In addition, in the State of the State address Gov. Holcomb announced a plan to take money from the surplus to pay pension payments owed by school districts, freeing up $70 million each of the next two years.  He said this money should be used for teacher pay increases.  Since it is one-time money and no plan to build it into future budgets was announced, it could be used for one-time bonuses for teachers.  The amounts available to school districts vary differentially according to how many teachers are in the post-1996 pension plan currently paid by school districts.  This means the $70 million available would not be available uniformly around the state but districts would vary in the amount they would get for this purpose depending on the pension plan of each teacher.  An analysis reported by the Indianapolis Star (1-18-19) revealed that school districts could potentially save between $600 per teacher and $1000 per teacher under the Governor’s pension payment plan and could redirect the savings as bonus pay through local bargaining procedures.
 
2. Federal Inflation Projection

Bureau of Labor Statistics latest inflation figures announced 2/13/19 for the 12 months ending January 2019: 1.6%

2019 BUDGET per 1.6% inflation:   

FY 2020                      $7.27 Billion                    +1.6%                         +$114 Million
FY 2021                      $7.39 Billion                    +1.6%                         +$116 Million
 
3. State Superintendent McCormick’s recommended 3% increase (Indianapolis Star, 10/2/18) 

2019 BUDGET per State Superintendent McCormick: 

FY 2020                      $7.37 Billion                    +3.0%                         +$210 Million
FY 2021                      $7.60 Billion                    +3.0%                         +$230 Million
_______________________________________________________________________________________
 
Contact Legislators This Week to Ask for a 3% Increase for K-12

A consensus has formed in the Statehouse that Indiana teachers are underpaid and need pay raises.  The best approach to that goal is to raise K-12 funding by 3%.  Two other methods suggested will not raise the base pay that teachers need to solidify their future earnings:

1. The Governor’s plan to free up pension money will provide potential bonuses for teachers on top of their base pay.  Since it is one-time money, $70 million each year, there is no guarantee it can be continued in the next biennium because it is not in the ongoing budget or the line item for K-12 tuition support.
2. House Bill 1003 proposes to flag superintendents and school boards that spend too much on “operations” and too little on classroom spending that can be used for teacher pay.  The penalties involve being called before the State Board of Education for public shaming.  The problem is that “operations” is defined to include spending on school safety, bus safety and public information for parents in our competitive school marketplace established by the General Assembly when the school choice voucher law passed in 2011.  No superintendent or school board should be given incentives to cut back on school safety, bus safety or parent information.  It’s a bad idea that has passed the House but is absolutely tone deaf to the intense calls for improving school safety, bus safety and parent information.  HB 1003 should be killed in the Senate with your help.

With this background, you are ready to ask House members this week and Senators later to put at least a 3% increase in the budget for K-12 funding. 

Good luck in your efforts!  Thank you for your active support of public education in Indiana!
 
Best wishes,
Vic Smith      vic790@aol.com
 

 
“Vic’s Statehouse Notes” and ICPE received one of three Excellence in Media Awards presented by Delta Kappa Gamma Society International, an organization of over 85,000 women educators in seventeen countries.  The award was presented on July 30, 2014 during the Delta Kappa Gamma International Convention held in Indianapolis.  Thank you Delta Kappa Gamma!

ICPE has worked since 2011 to promote public education in the Statehouse and oppose the privatization of schools.  We need your membership to help support ICPE lobbying efforts.  As of July 1st, the start of our new membership year, it is time for all ICPE members to renew their membership. 

Our lobbyist Joel Hand will continue to represent ICPE in the 2019 budget session.  We need your memberships and your support to continue his work. We welcome additional members and additional donations.  We need your help and the help of your colleagues who support public education!  Please pass the word!

This guest post is from Janet Stake, a board member of the Indiana Coalition for Public Education of Monroe County. Note: HB 1253 was amended in committee. It would provide grant money to schools to train teachers and other school employees to use guns. It passed its second reading in the House today, February 14. It will receive its third reading early next week.

As a retired teacher and school counselor, with years of experience in high school, including a high poverty one, I can not emphasize enough how House Bill 1253 will inevitably have unintended consequences:

1) The verified teacher shortage in Indiana will actually increase. The profile of a typical teacher is not the same as the profile of law enforcement personnel. Both have roles to play in serving society but now you are asking for teachers to enter a domain that they never had even a tiny bit of interest in pursuing.  

2) The "good guy with a gun" myth does not tend to pan out to stop an active shooter. It is not easy to hit a target when the shooter is moving and is actively shooting others. Have you even asked law enforcement what they think of this proposed bill?  Law enforcement generally does not support arming teachers because they do understand the myth that is being promulgated by the NRA.

3) Businesses will not come to Indiana, and many businesses will leave. It will be too risky to set up shop here because businesses do care about the quality of our schools and whether or not the schools are safe.  Arming teachers adds a whole new dimension of unknowns in the safety of schools.

4) Replacing school resource officers with teachers will cause a shortage of well-trained people on school grounds. With all of the tasks assigned to teachers today, do you really think that they will gladly take on this role, as well?  If so, then I believe you have not even bothered to ask teachers this critical question.

5) More guns in schools will mean more school shootings. The evidence all around the world and in our own country is clear on this issue. You should know this.

6) When you allocate money for arms training, you are inevitably taking money away from other critical school safety programs.

7) More innocent students and teachers will be shot and killed, by other teachers. Even if teachers successfully go through training, it does not make them experts or sharpshooters who will not make huge errors. The consequences of their actions are too big to bear physically and emotionally.

8) Schools will become more like police states. More guns means more weapons that need to be secured, and more scrutiny of children on school grounds.

Indiana's legislators must stop listening to the NRA. The NRA's concern is to promote gun sales, not to promote the well being of the American people, our schools, or our children. If the NRA had their way we would all be walking around carrying firearms at all times.  This is insanity and it is not civilization. Lawmakers should listen to actual experts who have done the research on guns and gun violence.

Tell your legislator to vote no on HB 1253.

Not sure who your legislator is? Click here to find out.

Is this what you want teachers in your school district learning?