Indiana Coalition for Public Education — Monroe County
  • About Us
    • Mission & Vision
    • Our Beliefs
    • By-Laws
    • Who Is Our Lobbyist
    • Why We Need to Defend Public Education
    • Board Members
    • Friends
    • How You Can Help
  • How to Join
  • Meetings & Events
    • Meetings & Calendar
    • Events
  • Podcast
  • Blog
  • Press
    • Contact the Press
    • In the News
    • Press Releases
    • Videos
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletters

Proposed Indiana laws will force parents of special needs children to pay for equal education

2/12/2019

 
With permission, we are sharing the following from the Cleary/Fowler Law Office in Gary, Indiana. House Bill 1629 and Senate Bill 507 will be heard in committee Wednesday, February 13.

Does your child have an Individualized Education Program, or IEP? Two bills pending in the Indiana legislature will make you pay for the right to challenge that IEP in court.

The federal law that created special education as we know it today--the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act--envisioned the IEP process as a collaborative effort between school staff and parents, with the shared goal of creating a program of special education that enables children with disabilities to one day live as independently as possible.

But too often, the IEP process fails to live up to these expectations. To address these rare circumstances, Congress created a procedure in the IDEA that enables parents to request a hearing to remedy their child's IEP. These "due process" hearings are decided by administrative judges and are parents’ last hope for securing an appropriate education for their children.

Unfortunately, two proposed Indiana laws are designed to frustrate the purpose of the IDEA and prevent parents from asserting their childrens' rights in due process hearings.

HB 1629 and SB 507 do this by wielding a powerful weapon against parents: money. Specifically, these bills will force parents to pay the school's attorney fees and litigation expenses if the parents don’t receive relief better than what the school offered. Put another way, even parents who win their cases may be forced to pay thousands of dollars to the school district after the case is decided. These bills will also force parents to pay for one half of the judge's fee in all hearings, win or lose, an amount which could easily rise into the thousands of dollars.

The purpose is clear--by giving school district attorneys the ability to threaten parents with tens of thousands of dollars in legal fees and expenses, parents will be discouraged from asserting their children’s educational civil rights guaranteed by federal law.

These bills contain a number of other provisions that will take Indiana backwards in education policy. One provision will exclude email and other electronic communications from Indiana's public records law, making our public schools less transparent and accountable. Another will require parents to obtain permission from the judge in their case before retaining an attorney of their own choosing! This requirement would infringe on a citizen’s right to hire his or her own attorney and would mark a dangerous breach of democratic norms.

Worse yet, the language in these bills is so sweeping that it would apply to any lawsuit initiated against a school—including claims for gender or race discrimination, disability discrimination, personal injury, and even employment claims brought by teachers or administrators against their school district.

Besides being likely unconstitutional, these bills do nothing to help education in Indiana. They are deliberately designed to make justice so expensive that it's unobtainable.

Most concerning is the fact that they reflect an ongoing trend in Indiana. During last year's legislative session, a law was enacted that required parents to provide notice 15 days in advance of requesting a due process hearing. This law--which duplicated a law already on the books since 1998--has since been used as another bureaucratic obstacle to prevent parents from asserting their child’s civil rights.

HB 1629 and SB 507 would mark a huge step backward in education policy. They would erect additional roadblocks for parents simply seeking to improve their child’s education, and they would disproportionately harm low-income parents, who already lack the special education options found in neighboring states. These bills should be rejected.

Instead of finding creative new ways to discourage parents from helping their disabled children, Indiana's legislators should ask parents: How can we help? The answers might surprise them.


Senate Education Committee members:
Republicans: Senators Raatz (chair), Buchanan, Crane, Freeman (bill sponsor), Kruse, Leising, Rogers, and Spart; Democrats: Senators Melton, Mrvan, Stoops

S27@iga.in.gov, S7@iga.in.gov, S24@iga.in.gov, S32@iga.in.gov, S14@iga.in.gov, S42@iga.in.gov, S11@iga.in.gov, S20@iga.in.gov, S3@iga.in.gov, S1@iga.in.gov,  S40@iga.in.gov

House Education Committee members:

Chair: Rep. Robert Behning - h91@in.gov
Vice Chair: Rep. Anthony Cook - h32@in.gov Rep. Woody Burton - h58@in.gov Rep. Edward Clere - h72@in.gov Rep. Dale DeVon - h5@in.gov Rep. Chuck Goodrich - h29@in.gov Rep. Jack Jordan - h17@in.gov Rep. Jim Lucas - h69@in.gov Rep. Jeffrey Thompson - h28@in.gov Rep. Vernon Smith - h14@in.gov Rep. Edward DeLaney - h27@in.gov Rep. Sheila Klinker - h27@in.gov Rep. Tonya Pfaff - h43@in.gov

Dawn Bland
2/13/2019 11:02:57 am

This could stop families who can’t afford a 504 plan fee from being able to send their children to school

ICPE–Monroe County
2/14/2019 10:55:25 pm

Hi Dawn,
I just want to clarify: Our understanding is not that there would be a charge for a 504 plan. If a family had an individualized education plan and wanted to challenge it in court, but the judge didn't rule for them, the family would be forced to pay the school district's legal costs. It's a bit convoluted, but it would remove an important legal tool. (Many if not most families would not want to take the risk.)

Brenda Shanabarger
2/13/2019 05:49:08 pm

This is wrong & you know it's wrong!

Mandie
2/13/2019 08:19:50 pm

Indiana is already so far behind! Why does anyone think this is a good idea?

ICPE–Monroe County
2/14/2019 10:57:27 pm

It's mysterious, isn't it! That's our question exactly.

Peter Henson
2/13/2019 09:37:04 pm

People in education understand why these laws are important. I hope they pass!

Jen Midkiff
2/14/2019 08:32:08 am

This educator doesn’t, thank you very much. Care to explain how this unconstitutional flaming ball of poo is GOOD for education or for our students? Or for our state budget, as it will undoubtedly be ruled as unconstitutional in court and tie up more of our state budget in litigation instead of, oh, I don’t know, PAYING OUR TEACHERS MORE. Or actually providing the IEP services needed!

ICPE–Monroe County
2/14/2019 11:00:47 pm

Hi Peter,
I just want to make sure I understand you. Which laws are important? Are you supportive of this bill? If so, do you want to say what experiences have led you to be so? It seems to reduce the legal options available to families if they believe their children's services or IEP are not adequate.

Michelle
2/14/2019 10:55:37 pm

This is a nightmare and those pushing it should be voted out of office planning to harm the most defenseless in their state by this it's not only wrong but against constitutional rights and Americans for disability act what are you smoking to think up this crap you need voted out of office asap

ICPE-Monroe County
2/14/2019 11:06:44 pm

Hi Michelle,
Thank you for your comment! If you haven't already, please email the committee members listed at the end of the post. It is likely they will vote on these bills next week. That will determine if the bills continue on for consideration by the full legislature.

Molly
2/16/2019 05:59:05 pm

I see the language in the House bill, but have read SB 507 and don't see this language. Where I am I missing it? Or is it a different bill number?

Barb
2/18/2019 10:34:16 am

This is just another way to give power the schools over any child's education. I had I child with an IEP and it took me taking him out of school and home schooling for a semester to get that. He was a good student in elementary school, but middle school was too restrictive for his ADD.
If I had a school age children today, they would be home schooled.


Comments are closed.

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

    Categories

    All
    Accountability
    A To F Grades
    Call To Action 2020
    Call To Action 2022
    Cathy's Speeches
    Charter School Program (CSP)
    Charter Schools
    Covid 19
    CRT
    Death By A Thousand Cuts $
    Democracy
    Diploma
    Education Scholarship Accounts (ESAs)
    Equity
    Events
    Follow The Money
    Free Lunch
    ILEARN
    IPS
    Kindergarten
    Petitions
    Race/history
    Redistricting
    Referendum Sharing
    Religion
    Reopening
    School Board
    School Choice
    School Marketing
    Special Education
    Statehouse
    Teachers
    Tech Trep
    Testing
    Textbooks
    Vic's Statehouse Notes
    Vouchers
    Year In Review

    Archives

    April 2022
    January 2022
    November 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    January 2021
    October 2020
    September 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    September 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    September 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    October 2015
    August 2015
    May 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    July 2014
    May 2014
    February 2014

    Friends

    Vic's Statehouse Notes
    Network for Public Education
    Northeast Indiana Friends of Public Education

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly
  • About Us
    • Mission & Vision
    • Our Beliefs
    • By-Laws
    • Who Is Our Lobbyist
    • Why We Need to Defend Public Education
    • Board Members
    • Friends
    • How You Can Help
  • How to Join
  • Meetings & Events
    • Meetings & Calendar
    • Events
  • Podcast
  • Blog
  • Press
    • Contact the Press
    • In the News
    • Press Releases
    • Videos
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletters